Saturday, October 8, 2011

Putting the 'IT' in Care Transitions

 
Healthcare transitions which are not well coordinated can lead to emergencies, higher costs and lower quality. This is a big problem. Breaking the cycle of hospitalization, nursing home admissions, home health visits, followed by repeated hospitalizations, then spiraling into decline with eventual death is something we must do. In the case of my mother the last years of her life went through this revolving door with very high mental, emotional and financial costs.

A study published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine, confirms what many of us have observed: health care transitions, such as moves in and out of the hospital from a nursing home, do not lead to positive outcomes. More common are frequent medical errors; poor care coordination, infections and additional medications. For patients with acute dementia, these transitions can exacerbate already present symptoms such as agitation, confusion and emotional distress. But improving care transitions is important for everyone.

On Friday, October 14th, 2011, a group of innovators, policy and health IT experts, healthcare providers, patient organizations, technology companies, and government agencies will gather in Washington, D.C. to assess progress in improving transitions in care and to prioritize how better use of health IT can address some of the most difficult challenges related to care transitions on a broader scale. Conference participants will identify:
  • Best practices using health IT that can be implemented immediately to improve care transitions
  • Best practices that can be implemented within a year 
  • A research agenda focused on finding solutions to persistent barriers to further progress.
As a wonderful example of using government as a platform, the John A. Hartford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Kaiser Permanente, with the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT and the Beacon Communities as key participants, are convening this event. Portions of the event will be webcast and there will be active discussion on Twitter and Google Plus. One goal is to encourage debate and interaction among all participants about this important subject through social and traditional media, before, during and after the meeting. Sign up for registration HERE, look for the hashtag #ITrans, and join in the conversation.

The event will focus on a set of prominent drivers of errors that are major opportunities for improvement by better using technology. There will be breakout session during the event on each of these levers. They are:
  1. Discharge process 
  2. Medication reconciliation 
  3. Information flow/exchange 
  4. Patient and care-giver activation
One of the aims of the event will be to coordinate and align multiple ongoing efforts related to transitional care interventions, with a special focus on the role of health IT in improving transitional care interventions. We will also review the most promising transitional care levers and attempt to achieve consensus among experts and practitioners about the most important characteristics or practices currently available. There will be an effort to identify current problems or constraints within each lever and specific actionable steps that can be taken by government, foundations, and the private sector to foster greater innovation/development. Strategies for spreading promising IT-enabled models, and barriers outside the realm of HIT will also be explored.

As HHS CTO Todd Park said, "Care transitions are difficult for patients and families for many reasons. If we can clearly identify the most challenging issues, for which no solutions exist today, we will provide much needed focus to innovators and investors across the country who are energized to improve care for patients, and systems of care for providers."

Some of the speakers participating in the event will be: National Coordinator for Health IT, Dr. Farzad Mostashari; Todd Park, Chief Technology Officer of HHS; Dr. Aaron McKethan, ONC Director of the Beacon Community Program; Dr. Eric Coleman, creator of the Care Transitions Intervention; Dr. Joanne Lynn, Altarum Institute; Carol Beasley, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) and Health Affairs Editor-in-Chief, Susan Dentzer.

Using technology to improve care transitions can have an incredible impact, not only on outcomes but eventually also on the cost of care. Health IT will be key to improving quality by better coordinating care across the healthcare continuum. “By expanding the smart use of health information technology during transitions, we are paving the way for smarter, lower-cost health care and new levels of sustainable health care quality,” said George Bo-Linn, MD, Chief Program Officer of the San Francisco Bay Area Program with the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. “This kind of large-scale, systemic change has the potential to make a difference in people’s lives that will be both lasting and significant.”

“With our eyes on the prize to ensure seamless transitions, we are pursuing a range of aligned strategies including standards, interoperability, exchange and provider adoption and meaningful use. Through our programs, we need to deeply understand and spread the simple yet powerful HIT-enabled solutions that address the complex problem of care transitions,” said Farzad Mostashari.

Care transitions refer to any movement patients make between practitioners and health care settings, but for the purpose of this meeting, are defined as hospital to post-hospital. Hospital readmissions, one common outcome of an unsuccessful transition, are extremely expensive: one in five Medicare patients is back in the hospital within 30 days of discharge, at the cost of approximately $17 billion per year, and many of these readmissions are considered avoidable.

“All health care providers understand both the human need to improve the patient experience during transitions of care, as well as the new demands that Medicare and others will be placing on systems to improve transitions. This meeting is an important service to anyone trying to create patient-centered transitions that are high quality, safe and efficient,” said Scott Young, MD, Associate Executive Director of Clinical Care and Innovation at Kaiser Permanente.

“It is increasingly clear that health information technology, implemented in a patient-centered way, has vast potential to help us reduce the number of injuries, accidents and re-hospitalizations that are causing stress and harm to patients, particularly older patients, every year,” said Christopher Langston, PhD, Program Director of the John A. Hartford Foundation. “We are committed to helping identify and support the best examples of health IT to assist complex patients in their most vulnerable moments.

Friday, October 7, 2011

Ada Lovelace 2.0 - Her Head in the Clouds and Feet on the Ground

Today is Ada Lovelace Day. Last year I wrote an Ada Lovelace post on Jennifer Pahlka, one of the the visionary founders of Code for America. Jennifer actually wrote a post on Carolyn Lawson two years ago for Ada Lovelace Day and this year I want to write about Carolyn. Carolyn recently served as director of the California eServices office and deputy director of the state’s Technology Services and Governance Division and was previously the CIO of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). While at CPUC, she led an effort to bring cloud computing to the agency and brought serious expertise in website re-design in various projects for California state government. In July this year she began her job as CIO of the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) and I am super excited about her role here.

I first met Carolyn at the Gov 2.0 events that Tim O'Reilly convened and then started following her on Twitter and watching her great work in California. This year we had some great discussions in Cambridge, Massachusetts at the first Health FOO. Carolyn presented last year at the Gov 2.0 Expo during a panel on "Finding Value in the Cloud" and in the video below she was interviewed by Alex Howard of O'Reilly Media during the conference:





Carolyn pioneered things like crowd sourcing and greater use of cloud services when she was with California and now in Oregon we will benefit from her experience and vision. Carolyn was also a winner of the prestigious in 2009 for her work in with CPUC for developing a secure mobile environment so employees could work from anywhere on any device, and 2010  for her work at the California eServices Office. One of the many innovations they instituted was a widget created for the state's Employment Development Department that combined the department's news, Twitter and YouTube services for the public. Within two months, the widget had received 2 million impressions and now after being placed on over six thousand websites it has received tens of millions of impressions. The office also worked with six other state organizations to develop and launch a website, at business.ca.gov, in support of the Office of Economic Development, after that office was created through the consolidation of other departments. Carolyn is able to use innovation and technology to do more with less.


This is exactly the kind of thinking that we need to apply to healthcare. With decreasing budgets and increasing needs we are approaching a crisis point in healthcare and as the landscape continues to shift Carolyn will be able to bring her insights and approach to help solve some of these vexing problems.

One area that Carolyn has been a thought leader in is in cloud computing. Carolyn's motto is "You don't say we can't, you say we can if..." Carolyn told me, "Could computing has now overcome many of the issues around security and now there is great opportunity for both government and business."  John Foley from Information Week interviewed here after her panel discussion back in 2008 at Enterprise 2.0's "Evening in the Cloud." which you can view below. Since then the industry has matured and some of the barriers to moving into the cloud have fallen away. "Regarding cloud computing 'No!' should not be engraved in your thinking. Maybe in some cases it is 'Not today,' but always be willing to look to the future." I couldn't agree more...



Tuesday, September 27, 2011

HIMSS EHR Association Comments NwHIN Power Team Deliberations



The NwHIN Power Team, a subcommittee of the HIT Standards Committee, has been working over the past few months to analyze and score the NwHIN Exchange (SOAP) and Direct (SMTP/SMIME) specifications on such criteria as:
  • Need for specified capability
  • Maturity of the specification
  • Maturity of the underlying technology used in the specification
  • Deployment and operational complexity
  • Industry adoption
  • Available alternatives
The Power Team reviewed and refined these scores through several iterations, and will present their final analysis and recommendations at the September 28, 2011 HIT Standards Committee meeting.Below are the slides from the NwHIN Power Team recommendations:



Based on industry experience and investments in these efforts not only by health IT suppliers but also by provider organizations, the EHR Association has provided comments to the NwHIN Power Team, focused on several key points, including:

  • Vendor readiness to support the NwHIN Patient Discovery, Query for Documents, and Retrieve (IHE XCPD & XCA) standards is more advanced than reflected in the Power Team analysis.
  • We encourage the Power Team to address the gap resulting from the decision to not consider the use case for sharing health Information among HIE communities.
  • Concerns expressed regarding the “complexity” of the Patient Discovery specification do not reflect the reality that this complexity comes not from the specifications, but from policy decisions not to develop shared patient identification principles and related operational deployment issues.
  • The rationale for proposing to develop a RESTful approach as an alternative to the NwHIN needs to be validated.
  • The Power Team discussion about why a specification gets a low or medium rating should be documented for the sake of transparency.

The full comments (available here) containing a detailed discussion have been submitted to the Power Team. I will post more after the Power Team makes their recommendations to the HIT Standards Committee.

The EHR Association is comprised of industry experts in the field of healthcare information technology with a broad scope of expertise such as medical and clinical informaticists, physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and technology experts who not only represent the EHR software industry but also interact and represent the entire healthcare community. The EHR Association offers unmatched experience and expertise, and provides a forum and structure for EHR leaders to work toward standards development, interoperability, the EHR certification process, performance and quality measures, HIT legislation, and other EHR issues.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Hearing on Healthcare Industry Consolidation

On September 9, 2011 the U. S. House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee held a hearing on the consolidation taking place in the healthcare industry. The hearing focused on the impact healthcare consolidation is having on the cost of private health insurance, Medicare spending, and beneficiary costs. The subcommittee's ranking member, Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) Rep. Charles Boustany (R-La.) said "It's refreshing to see our majority raise concerns about competition in the marketplace and how it may result in outcomes that are bad for consumers and for Medicare." Rep. Charles Boustany (R-La.) a cardiovascular surgeon and chairman of the Ways and Means oversight panel, said the healthcare reform law focused too much on getting doctors and hospitals to work together and not enough on the potential downsides.

Chairman Wally Herger (R-CA) called the meeting with the following statement:
Recent years have seen a large number of acquisitions and mergers in the health care industry. Among typical transactions, hospitals are buying or merging with other hospitals, hospitals are purchasing physician practices, physician practices are merging with physician groups, and large insurance companies are purchasing smaller plans. Industry experts expect regulations and policies contained in the new health care overhaul to exacerbate this trend.
While such consolidation may facilitate greater efficiencies and deliver higher quality services by eliminating duplication and excess capacity, many experts are concerned that some consolidations are being driven primarily by a desire to increase reimbursements. Richard Feinstein, director of the Bureau of Competition at the Federal Trade Commission, warned that provider consolidation “can create highly concentrated markets that may harm consumers through higher prices or lower quality care.”

In announcing the hearing, Chairman Herger stated, “While consolidation within the health care industry is not new a phenomenon, all signs point to it accelerating in the coming years. In some circumstances, consolidation produces desirable results like improved efficiency and quality. However, we must ensure that consolidation is not simply used as a tool to increase revenues by driving up Medicare spending and the cost of private health insurance. This hearing will provide members with a better understanding of what is currently taking place, what is expected to occur, and how we can protect America’s seniors and those with private health insurance and the employers who offer it.”

The following witness presented during the hearing:

Martin Gaynor, PhD
Professor, H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University
(Testimony)

Paul B. Ginsburg, PhD
President, Center for Studying Health System Change
(Testimony)

Dianne Kiehl
Executive Director, Business Health Care Group
(Testimony)

Michael Guarino
Member, Board of Directors, Ambulatory Surgery Center Association
(Testimony)

David Balto
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress Action Fund
(Testimony)

The American Medical Association (AMA) also submitted a statement during the hearing on the topic. The AMA’s statement examined the current state of consolidation in the health care industry, including areas where changes are needed to protect patients and encourage the success of new models of patient care.

“Existing antitrust policies allow significant consolidation in some areas of our health care system while overly restricting the coordination of care by physicians,” said AMA President Peter W. Carmel, M.D. “It is time to update these policies to allow physicians in all practice sizes the ability to lead and participate in innovative new models of care while protecting patients from anticompetitive practices.”

A full 78 percent of office-based physicians in the United States work in practices with nine physicians or less, and a majority of those are in practices of one to four. Under existing antitrust enforcement policies, these physician practices are effectively prohibited from forming clinically integrated groups that can jointly contract with private payers and participate in care improvement and coordination efforts.

Over the last decade AMA studies have consistently found that a wide majority of local health insurance markets across the nation are highly concentrated, which can mean decreased competition and higher prices for patients. The trend of hospitals merging and acquiring physician practices can also lead to reduced competition and an increase in the amount of care patients receive in more costly inpatient settings.

“We applaud the Ways and Means Committee for examining current policies related to consolidation in health care,” Dr. Carmel said. “We will continue to work with them to design policies that encourage the development of innovative, physician-led new models of patient care designed to improve quality, lower costs and promote competitive health care markets.”

The National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS) has asked for scrutiny on the proposed merger of pharmacy benefit managers Express Scripts and Medco and outlined the “problems” it believes would result from the mega-merger in a letter submitted to the committee. NACDS stressed that the anticompetitive nature of this merger ultimately will hurt patients the most, limiting their choice in how and where they obtain their pharmacy services and prescription medications.

“NACDS thanks the Committee for consideration of our comments on healthcare industry consolidation. We are extremely skeptical that the American public can trust a ‘super PBM’ to look out for the best interests of patients and payors, including Medicare Part D, or to pass any purported ‘savings’ along to beneficiaries and other consumers. These concerns are compounded by the fact that the PBM industry as a whole is virtually unregulated,” NACDS concluded in its comments.
Three House Democrats also urged the Federal Trade Commission to closely scrutinize the merger in a letter to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. "The proposed merger would affect hundreds of millions of Americans with private health insurance and have a potentially significant impact on drug cost for government programs," said Reps. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.), Frank Pallone Jr. (D., N.J.) and Diana DeGette (D., Colo.).

VIDEO:


Get Microsoft Silverlight