Friday, December 30, 2011

Looking back at 2011...

2011 has been an interesting year for healthcare information technology. Starting in February with the launch of Direct Project pilot there has been continued momentum for health information exchange and a strong push for interoperability. Less than a year from the birth of the project, having real world implementation is lightening speed for a government sponsored effort. The Direct Project has been a remarkable success story and will have long lasting impact on health information exchange. In April I helped facilitate the DirectProject Boot Camp, which was a remarkable success.

Also in February, the annual HIMSSconference was a usual highlight of the year. There was a focus on new payment and delivery models and the health IT infrastructure necessary to enable the future of healthcare, as well as a great deal of mobile healthcare applications and other innovative solutions demonstrated. One of best parts is always the Interoperability Showcase, and this year had some really great demonstrations. The new HIT X.0 format was exciting and I am looking forward to seeing how this develops in the future. Perhaps my favorite part was the increasing status of the social media efforts. The Social Media Pavilion seems to be growing by leaps and bounds and I expect next year to be bigger than ever.

In April we saw the changingof the guard at ONC as Farzad Mostashari took the helm from the departing David Blumenthal. It was widely expected that Dr. Blumenthal would only lead the agency for two years. Blumenthal had cast the vision for PHR adoption and implementation of health IT and I believe that Dr. Mostashari is the ideal person to listen to the next phase. There is been a huge increase this year and the number of providers and hospitals registering for meaningful use incentive payments. With over $2 billion paid out this year so far, I expect the 2012 will be a very big year for the ONC.

In June the IOM and HHS hosted the HealthData Initiative Forum to accelerate momentum for the public use of data and innovation to improve health. There was an amazing array of sessions, which were webcast live, and a truly outstanding set of speakers and panel presentations. There were fast-paced Ignite style demonstrations of a variety of innovative technology solutions.

In July we launched our own DirectProject pilot. As our local health information exchange efforts have gone forward we have been blessed with a strong sense of collaboration from area stakeholders. Gorge Health Connect Inc. also achieved status as a 501(c) three charitable organization with the IRS. This was no small feat and I'm very pleased at our progress on governance and designing our technical architecture. The partnership with our vendor Medicity has been excellent and I am looking forward to watching the data flow 2012.

Also in July was the first ever Health Foo in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The best summary I've seen of that amazing weekend is by Susannah Fox. O’Reilly Media and Robert Woods Johnson Foundation gathered a mind blowing stew of thought leaders. This was one of the brightest group of people I have ever been exposed to and it was an honor to participate.

NationalHealth IT Week  was in September with continued strong efforts at advocacy for the health IT community. One of the highlights of the week was the launch of a Consumer Health IT Program by the ONC to support greater consumer engagement in health and healthcare via information technology. The ONC’s focus on consumer engagement really gained steam this year, especially with the work of Lygeia Ricciardi, Senior Policy Advisor on Consumer eHealth. This was followed in October by the Putting the 'IT' in Care Transitions event, which brought together thought leaders from around the country to work on some of the most pressing issues facing our healthcare system.

Health reform and health IT go hand in hand as the linchpin of efforts to reforming our healthcare system is technology enabled. And my greatest disappointment by far in 2011 was the departure of Don Berwick from CMS. He cast a vision for investment and research in information technology leading to accountable care organizations, medical homes and other innovations in delivery and payment models. However, I am hopeful that he may actually be able to accomplish more released from the bonds of government service. His farewell speech The Moral Test:Remember the Patient is must reading for anyone interested in healthcare.

The creation of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation will be an enduring legacy of Dr. Berwick’s work at CMS. Their mission to transform Medicare/Medicaid by improving the healthcare delivery system as well as implementing new models of payment will have wide ranging impact for the next generation. The HealthCare Innovation Challenge is one place I expect to see some significant results.

These are really just a handful of the events over this remarkable year in health IT. I felt like I should write something before the year was up, so these are only some highlights that came to mind this morning. There is a great deal more that has happened which will springboard us into an amazing future for our healthcare system. Maybe I'm overly optimistic, but I truly believe that we're in the midst of a hinge point in history. Years from now I believe we will see that the changes underway lady a foundation that enabled improvements in innovative solutions we can now only barely imagine. I am looking forward to this next year…

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Healthcare Innovation Challenge Materials

The CMS Innovation Center's Health Care Innovation Challenge

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hosted four webinars on its Health Care Innovation Challenge, which will spend a billion dollars through awards of up to $30 million over three years to projects that identify and test promising new payment and care delivery models for Medicare, Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. I have synced the slides with the audio to make the webinar archive easier to view.

The objectives of this initiative are to:
  • Engage a broad set of innovation partners to identify and test new care delivery and payment models that originate in the field and that produce better care, better health, and reduced cost through improvement for identified target populations. 
  • Identify new models of workforce development and deployment and related training and education that support new models either directly or through new infrastructure activities. 
  • Support innovators who can rapidly deploy care improvement models (within six months of award) through new ventures or expansion of existing efforts to new populations of patients, in conjunction (where possible) with other public and private sector partners.
You can view and listen to each of the webinars below. There are resources listed under that. I will also be updating this post with additional useful information for those who are applying for this opportunity. The expanding FAQ for this funding is available at

CMS Innovation Center staff hosted the first is a series of informational webinar on
the Health Care Innovation Challenge for all interested individuals and organizations
on Thursday, November 17, 2011. Staff provided an overview of the initiative and
were available to answer questions from the audience.

This second webinar was held on Tuesday, December 6th, 2011 to provide guidance on the application process with specific attention towards designing effective project proposals.

In this third of four-webinar series on the Innovation Challenge held December 19, 2011,
CMS Innovation Center staff presented an explanation of "Total Cost of Care" and how
potential applicants can demonstrate their path to achieving lower costs through improvement.

This fourth presentation was the final overview webinar on the Innovation Challenge
before applications are due. CMS Innovation Center staff presented how potential
innovative proposals can demonstrate measurable impact on the aims of better care
and better health in addition to considerations for operational planning for potential applications.


Public Sources for CMS or HHS Approved Quality Measures 

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Remember the Patient

The Picker Award for Excellence, which recognizes outstanding achievement in promoting and furthering patient-centered care, was awarded to Dr. Don Berwick on Wednesday, Dec. 7, the last day of the 23rd annual national forum hosted by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, which Dr. Berwick cofounded in 1989. Below are his comments accepting the award:

The Moral Test

Don Berwick, MD 
IHI National Forum 
Orlando, Florida: December 7, 2011

Let me begin by thanking the Picker Institute for this honor. I am touched to be in such good company, and especially for a theme so close to my heart – patient-centered care. And let me also say a word of personal reverence for Harvey Picker. He was a man of grace, vision, and action. He changed forever our understanding about the proper relationship between the people who get care and the people who give it.

And, I need to say a word about Maureen Bisognano. For years, I have known that the luckiest step in my entire professional career was Maureen’s joining IHI in 1995. She made into the organization it has become. She is the best colleague I have ever had – bar none. Now, I know that that was the second luckiest step. The new luckiest step was Maureen’s willingness to become IHI’s President and CEO. Thanks to her, I can see after this time away, IHI has soared to entirely new heights with stronger patient voice, wider global reach, an Open School that now includes 74,000 students, and a whole new level of presence and gravitas in the global health care scene. Maureen, you are a treasure – a global treasure, and it is an honor to have you as our leader.

It is good to be back. For me, the past 16 months have been quite an expedition; I feel like Marco Polo. Never having expected it, I journeyed into the world of national policy and politics at the most tumultuous time for both modern American health care and the modern global economy. To keep things in perspective, I also watched grandson #1 – Nathaniel – grow to 2 ½ years old, and we welcomed grandson #2 – Caleb – into the world 8 weeks ago.

The time at CMS has been a privilege. I got the chance to work with thousands of career public servants, and to learn how much these people do for us all, unsung and too often unappreciated. These are the people who translate laws into regulations and regulations into deeds. In CMS these are the people who keep the lights on – they see that providers get paid, they protect the public trust, they help the most vulnerable people in America, and make sure that they get the care they need.

And, I got the chance to help pilot toward harbor the most important health care policy of our time – the Affordable Care Act. A majestic law. I learned that a law is only a framework; it’s like an architect’s sketch. If it’s going to help anyone, it has to be transformed into the specifications that regulations and guidance documents. Only then can become real programs with real resources that reach real people. On my expedition, that, mostly, was what I was doing.

I would have loved to keep at that job longer. But, as you know, the politics of Washington, and especially the politics of the United States Senate, said, “No.” But, overall, I don’t feel an ounce of regret. What I feel is grateful for the chance I had to serve, and for the generous support I felt, including from so many of you.

I want this afternoon to share with you a little of what I learned on the expedition; and what I think it means for you – for all of us. It’s a sort of good-news-bad-news situation. The good news: the possibility of change has never been greater – not in my lifetime. The bad news: if it’s going to be the right change, the burden is yours.

When I first got the job, my brother, Bob, a retired middle school science teacher and a very wise man, gave me a sign to put on my desk. It read, “How will it help the patient?” It was there from the minute I arrived until the minute I left. Maureen gave me the same sort of advice just before I left IHI. I asked her how I could succeed at CMS, and she said, “That’s easy; just mention a patient five times a day.” Bob’s advice and Maureen’s was the best I got – hands down – from anyone else anywhere else. Remember the patient.

As it turns out, that’s not easy in an office just a few hundred yards from the US Capitol Building – less than a mile from the White House. Every morning at breakfast, the stewards of national policy and politics rush to scan the Washington Post and Politico and to wolf down the day’s Capitol Hill newsletters and blogs. What they are finding out is what each other says. Which Senator has raised an eyebrow? Which lobbyist has cried foul? Which Committee is launching which outraged inquiry into which shocking development. In Washington, a day without a shocking development is hardly worth getting up for. And, of course, who is ahead? Always, who is ahead? My son, Dan, when he first knew I was going to Washington, and who had lived there, said to me: “Just remember, Dad, Washington is a city where everyone is trying to get into a room they aren’t yet in.”
In that self-absorbed culture, the question, “How does it help the patient?” isn’t always the first one asked. In fact, it can seem naïve – not on point. And yet, I learned that, in Washington, DC, just like here, it is exactly the right question. The best public policy and the best public management answer it. This is only Harvey Picker’s idea reframed – from patient-centered care to patient-centered policy.

And that leads me to a second big lesson. I can best explain it to you by describing a visit I made in the fall of 2011 to a small rural hospital – Lower Umpqua Hospital in Reedsport, Oregon. I was on a so-called “Rural Road Trip” visiting rural hospitals to learn from them.

At a meeting there, one of the doctors spoke up – Dr. Robert Law – and he captivated me. Dr. Law, I learned, was the Oregon Academy of Family Practice’s “Family Physician of the Year” in 1999. And two sentences into his remarks at the meeting, I could see why. He spoke from his heart. He said how deeply he cared about his community, his patients, and his professionalism. He told why he felt lucky to be serving, and how willing he was to try out new ways to meet needs, even while resources get tighter. He said how offended he was by waste in the health care system – even in Reedsport – and how hard he wanted to work to make sure that every single thing done to, for, and with patients and families would actually help them – on their terms, not his. And – most importantly – he asked for help – for a context of policy, payment, and information that, simply put, would help him get his work done with pride and joy. “If things don’t change soon,” he told me last week, “I am not sure how we can keep going.”

Cynicism grips Washington. It grips Washington far too much... far too much for a place that could instead remind us continually of the grandeur of democracy. I vividly remember my first trip ever to Washington, DC. I was twelve years old, and friends took me to the Lincoln Memorial just after sunset. I looked from the statue of Abraham Lincoln, past the Reflecting Pool and the Washington Monument, to the glowing Capitol Building in the distance – the same Capitol that I saw outside my office window every day for the past 16 months. And, twelve years old, I cried in awe and admiration for – what shall I call it? - majesty.
Two weeks ago, Congress’s approval rating fell to an all-time low: 9%.

How did that happen? It happens when the cynics are winning. In a city where everyone wishes to be in a room they are not yet in, it is easy to see everyone as on the make, everyone maneuvering, everyone with elbows sharpened. It becomes too easy to lose hope and confidence, and to forget what can be noble in human nature.

When the lens through which one sees the world magnifies combat, dissembling, and greed, then trust decays and those who deserve to be trusted feel bad – misunderstood, confused, and impeded in their good works.

Dr. Robert Law is not cynical, and he is not on the make. He is dedicated to a life of service to a community he loves, and in which he raised his own three children – Alison, Brian, and Duncan. The job of public servants is to serve him so that he can better serve others. He needs help, resources, encouragement, voice, and respect. His promise – what he can offer our nation – has nothing to do with preventing fraud, holding his feet to the fire, or audits, and it has little to do with payment for performance, public measurement, incentives, or accountability. He is a good person who needs dignified assistance to do good work… and he is legion.

He can be the future. He, in fact, can and will rescue us, if we will help him help us.

If lesson one for me is, “Remember the patient,” then lesson two is this: “Help those who help others.” Those thoughts – not the negativity – guided my in DC, and they made my time there meaningful.

They are reminders of what is truly important; not the noise, but simply this: to help the people who need our help the most. Inscribed on the wall of the great hall at the entrance to the Hubert Humphrey Building, the HHS Headquarters in Washington where my office was, is a quotation from Senator Humphrey at the building’s dedication ceremony on November 4, 1977. It says: "The moral test of government is how it treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the handicapped."

I believe that. Indeed, I think that Senator Humphrey described the moral test, not just of government, but of a nation. This is a time of great strain in America; uncertainty abounds. With uncertainty comes fear, and with fear comes withdrawal. We can climb into our bunkers, each separately, and bar the door. But, remember, millions of Americans don’t have a bunker to climb into – they have no place to hide. For many of them, indeed, the crisis of economic security that we all dread now is no crisis at all – it is their status quo. The Great Recession is just their normal life.

The rate of poverty in this country is rising. Over 100 million Americans – nearly one in every three of us – is in poverty or near-poverty today – 17 million of them children. I will tell you – state by state, community-by-community, and in the halls of Washington, itself – the security of the poor – their ability to find the health care they need, and the food, and the housing, and the jobs, and the schools – all of it, hangs by a thread. The politics of poverty have never been power politics in America, for the simple reason that the poor don’t vote and the children don’t vote and the sickest among us don’t vote. And, if those who do vote do not assert firmly that Senator Humphrey was right, and if we do not insist on a government that passes the moral test – the thread will break, and shame on us if it does.

Cynicism diverts energy from the great moral test. It toys with deception, and deception destroys. Let me give you an example: the outrageous rhetoric about “death panels” – the claim, nonsense, fabricated out of nothing but fear and lies, that some plot is afoot to, literally, kill patients under the guise of end-of-life care. That is hogwash. It is purveyed by cynics; it employs deception; and it destroys hope. It is beyond cruelty to have subjected our elders, especially, to groundless fear in the pure service of political agendas.

The truth, of course, is that there are no “death panels” here, and there never have been. The truth is that, as our society has aged and as we have learned to care well for the chronically ill, many of us face years in the twilight our lives when our health fades and our need for help grows and changes. Luckily, palliative care – care that brings comfort, company, and spiritual and emotional support to people with advanced illness and their families – has grown at its best into a fine art and a better science. The principle is simple: that we can and should offer people the very best of care at all stages of their lives, including the twilight.

The truth is, furthermore, that patient-centered care demands that the ways in which a person is cared for ought always to be under his or her control. The patient is the boss; we are the servants. They, not others, should direct their own care, and the doctors, nurses, and hospitals should know and honor what the patient wants. Some of us want to be guaranteed that, no matter how sick or close to death we are, every single machine, drug, and device that could help us live even a moment longer should be used; and that is, therefore, exactly what they should have. And, other if us want not to spend our final days in an intensive care unit, attached to machines, but rather, say, to be at home, in our own bed surrounded by our loved ones in a familiar place, but still receiving world-class treatment for pain and complications; then that is, therefore, exactly what they should have. It is one of the great and needless tragedies of this stormy time in health care that the “death panel” rhetoric has denied patients the care that they want, denied caregivers the information they need to give that care, and denied our nation access to a mature, open, informed, and balanced discussion of the challenge of advanced illness and the commitment to individual dignity. It is a travesty.

If you really want to talk about “death panels,” let’s think about what happens if we cut back programs of needed, life-saving care for Medicaid beneficiaries and other poor people in America. What happens in a nation willing to say a senior citizen of marginal income, “I am sorry you cannot afford your medicines, but you are on your own?” What happens if we choose to defund our nation’s investments in preventive medicine and community health, condemning a generation to avoidable risks and unseen toxins? Maybe a real death panel is a group of people who tell health care insurers that is it OK to take insurance away from people because they are sick or are at risk for becoming sick. Enough of “death panels”! How about all of us – all of us in America – becoming a life panel, unwilling to rest easy, in what is still the wealthiest nation on earth, while a single person within our borders lacks access to the health care they need as a basic human right? Now, that is a conversation worth having.

And, while we are at it, what about “rationing?” The distorted and demagogic use of that term is another travesty in our public debate. In some way, the whole idea of improvement – the whole, wonderful idea that brings us –thousands – together this very afternoon – is that rationing – denying care to anyone who needs it is not necessary. That is, it is not necessary if, and only if, we work tirelessly and always to improve the way we try to meet that need.

The true rationers are those who impede improvement, who stand in the way of change, and who thereby force choices that we can avoid through better care. It boggles my mind that the same people who cry “foul” about rationing an instant later argue to reduce health care benefits for the needy, to defund crucial programs of care and prevention, and to shift thousands of dollars of annual costs to people – elders, the poor, the disabled – who are least able to bear them. When the 17 million American children who live in poverty cannot get the immunizations and blood tests they need, that is rationing. When disabled Americans lack the help to keep them out of institutions and in their homes and living independently, that is rationing. When tens of thousands of Medicaid beneficiaries are thrown out of coverage, and when millions of Seniors are threatened with the withdrawal of preventive care or cannot afford their medications, and when every single one of us lives under the sword of Damocles that, if we get sick, we lose health insurance, that is rationing. And it is beneath us as a great nation to allow that to happen.

And that brings me to the opportunity we now have and a duty. A moral duty: to rescue American health care the only way it can be rescued – by improving it.

I have never seen, nor had I dared hope to see, an era in American health care when that is more possible than this very moment. The signs are everywhere. In the past two years, major hospital systems are asking at last how they can coordinate care. Specialty societies are coalescing around plans for more evidence-based care, the use of clinical registries, serious recertification, and reduction of overuse of unhelpful care. The patient safety movement is maturing, with numerous national efforts to bring excellence to scale, including the billion-dollar Partnership for Patients that we launched in HHS. Insurers are experimenting with much more integrated payment models, of which Accountable Care Organizations are only one breed. Transparency is, I believe and hope, about to leap forward. Patients’ and consumers’ groups are more active and more sophisticated, and they are gaining the footholds they need in governance. Employer groups and labor unions are uniting in their demands. And states are on the move – states like Oregon, Arkansas, and Massachusetts – where courageous and visionary governors – like John Kitzhaber, Mike Beebe, and Deval Patrick – are catalyzing transformation.

And, though no sane person would have wished on us the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression, the global downturn has added tons to the pressure for change. We are headed for a cliff, and we need to change course. And that means health care needs to change course. To be clear, we have not changed course yet. Not enough. Not hardly. All the unfreezing has not yet moved health care into its new and needed state. In truth, we have only been getting ready. The Affordable Care Act helps, but, a law is not change – it set the table for change. A Constitutional provision for a free press does nothing until a press turns somewhere. And a law that provides support for seamless, coordinated care has done nothing until some person who needs it gets it.

This is the threshold we have now come to, but not yet crossed: the threshold from the care we have to the care we need.

We can do this… we who give care. And nobody else can. The buck has stopped. The Federal framework is set by the Affordable Care Act and important prior laws, such as the HITECH Act, and, quite frankly, we can’t expect any bold statutory movement with a divided Congress within the next year or more. The buck has stopped; it has stopped with you. Now comes the choice. To change, or not to change.

It is not possible to claim that we do not know what to do. We have the templates. If you doubt it, visit the brilliant Nuka care system at Southcentral Foundation in Anchorage, which just won the Baldrige Award. I visited in October. Thoroughly integrated teams of caregivers – physicians, advanced practice nurses, behavioral health specialists, nutritionists, and more – occupying open physical pods in line-of-sight contact with each other all day long, weaving a net of help and partnership with Alaska Native patients and families. The results: 60% fewer Emergency and Urgent Care Visits, 50% fewer hospitalizations, and 40% less use of specialists, along with staff turnover 1/5th as frequent as before the new care.

If you doubt that we know what to do, visit Denver Health or ThedaCare or Virginia Mason, and see the Toyota principles of lean production learned, mastered, adapted, and deployed through entire systems and into the skills and psyches of entire workforces. The result, over $100 million in savings at Denver Health while vastly improving the experience and outcomes of patients.

If you doubt that we know what to do, contact George Halvorson at Kaiser Permanente and ask him how they have reduced sepsis mortality – sepsis is the cause of death in 24% of seniors who die in California hospitals. Kaiser-Permanente has driven down sepsis mortality by nearly half – to 11% in less than three years.
Let me put it simply: in this room, with the successes already in hand among you here, you collectively have enough knowledge to rescue American health care – hands down. Better care, better health, and lower cost through improvement right here. In this room. The only question left is: Will you do it?

When we entered the world of health care improvement as our life’s work, we didn’t ask for the burden we now bear. We did not ask to be responsible for rescuing health care. But, here we are, and, as intimidating as the fact may be, that burden is ours. Our nation is at a crossroad. The care we have simply cannot be sustained. It will not work for health care to chew ever more deeply into our common purse. If it does, our schools will fail, our roads will fail, our competitiveness will fail. Wages will continue to lag, and, paradoxically, so will our health.

The choice is stark: chop or improve. If we permit chopping, I assure you that the chopping block will get very full – first with cuts to the most voiceless and poorest us, but, soon after, to more and more of us. Fewer health insurance benefits, declining access, more out-of-pocket burdens, and growing delays. If we don’t improve, the cynics win. That’s what passes the buck to us. If improvement is the plan, than we own the plan. Government can’t do it. Payers can’t do it. Regulators can’t do it. Only the people who give the care can improve the care.

What’s the strategy? Let me show you one. I owe much of this to my friend and colleague, Andy Hackbarth, who has been collaborating with Joe McCannon, others, and me for much of the year to develop a set of lenses clear enough to let us see the pathway to success. We began with work far from health care – the work of a Princeton economist and environmental expert named Robert Socolow. Professor Socolow published an important article in 2004 in Science magazine, trying to answer a very important question: “What is the way to slow the rate of atmospheric carbon production enough to avert catastrophic carbon levels in the future.” Here is his answer: “There is no way.” That is, there is no single way to do it. Automobile emission control can’t do it. Solar power can’t do it. Conservation can’t do it. The only way we can do it is to do, not one thing, but everything. When I read Socolow’s article, I thought instantly of Göran Henrik’s answer to me when I asked him a few years ago how Jönköping County in Sweden was achieving such pace-setting results in total health system performance. Göran said, “Here’s the secret: We do everything.”

“Do everything” – that’s Socolow’s answer to the global warming problem. Luckily, nothing more than everything is necessary, and, unluckily, nothing less than everything is sufficient. Socolow diagrammed “everything” as what he called, “wedges.” In his chart, the lower line is the line of “sustainability.” It shows the highest levels of atmospheric carbon that do not lead to runaway warming. It’s the goal. The top line is the “business as usual” line; it shows how fast carbon levels rise if we stay on the current course.

The “wedges” – Socolow proposes 15 of them – 15 changes that affect carbon output – fill what Socolow calls the “sustainability triangle.” The “wedges” framework looks a lot like a strategic plan, or at least a system of strategic goals, whose cumulative effect – all together – is a sustainable level of carbon, so that we don’t cook Planet Earth.

Solving the health care crisis has wedges, too. We don’t have as crystal clear a target – a sustainability level that works for total US health care spend – but for sure our business-as-usual line isn’t it. Pay on that line over time, and schools suffer, roads suffer, museums suffer, and private consumption suffers because, as Tom Nolan said years ago, “It’s our money.” It is all wages.

Now, I probably owe you an apology for talking about costs. I know that, among the important dimensions of quality – safety, effectiveness, patient-centered care, timeliness, efficiency, and equity – I am not sure any of us would have chosen “efficiency” – the reduction of waste – as our favorite. It’s not my favorite. Nonetheless, it is the quality dimension of our time. I would go so far as to say that, for the next three to five years at least, the credibility and leverage of the quality movement will rise or fall on its success in reducing the cost of health care – and, harder, returning that money to other uses – while improving patient experience. “Value” improvement won’t be enough. It will take cost reduction to capture the flag. Otherwise, “cutting” wins.

But, I am not going to apologize. That’s because if you are a student of lean thinking or quality, itself – if you have taken the time to study the work of Noriaki Kano, or Jim Womack, or Taichi Ohno, or Dr.Deming, you know that great leverage in cost reduction comes directly – powerfully – exactly from focusing on meeting the needs of the person you serve. “Waste” is actually just a word that means, “Not helpful.” So, that initial wave of reaction – “Who wants to work on efficiency” – is actually off the mark. In very large measure, improving care and reducing waste are one and the same thing.

How much cost reduction? Well, If we look to Europe for ideas, then a target of, say, 12% of our GDP, far below our current 17% would look plausible. If you want to stay at home for signals, find the lowest cost quartile of American health can economies – hospital referral regions or HRRs – and we’d be somewhere in the neighborhood of 15% of GDP.

Or, maybe that looks tough, and you’d be more comfortable if health care began to behave just as well as, but no better than, the rest of the economy – that is, rising in synch with the GDP, itself, and just staying where it is – 17% or so.

The point is, with costs rising a great deal faster than that, no matter what your goal is, you’ve got a sustainability triangle to fill – the growing, cumulative difference between unsustainable “business as usual” costs and the sustainable ones. The social imperative for reducing health care cost is enormous. And, to meet that enormous need, I suggest, just as with the environmental triangle, for the health care cost triangle, nothing works. Only everything works. It’s all or none, or we head straight on and over the cliff.

Andy Hackbarth and I took a stab at defining the “wedges” for health care costs. These are the names of the forms of waste whose removal from the system both helps patients thrive and reduces the cost of care. We found six wedges, for starters, and we estimated their size.

Overtreatment – the waste that comes from subjecting people to care that cannot possibly help them – care rooted in outmoded habits, supply-driven behaviors, and ignoring science.
Failures of Coordination- the waste that comes when people – especially people with chronic illness – fall through the slats. They get lost, forgotten, confused. The result: complications, decays in functional status, hospital readmissions, and dependency.
Failures of Reliability – the waste that comes with poor execution of what we know to do. The result: safety hazards and worse outcomes.
Administrative Complexity – the waste that comes when we create our own rules that force people to do things that make no sense – that converts valuable nursing time into meaningless charting rituals or limited physician time into nonsensical and complex billing procedures.
Pricing Failures – the waste that comes as prices migrate far from the actual costs of production plus fair profits.
Fraud and Abuse – the waste that comes as thieves steal what is not theirs, and also from the blunt procedures of inspection and regulation that infect everyone because of the misbehaviors of a very few. We have estimated how big this waste is – from both the perspective of the Federal payers – Medicare and Medicaid – and for all payers.

Research and analytic literature contain a very wide range of estimates, but, at the median, the total annual level of waste in just these six categories (and I am sure there are more) exceeds $1 trillion every year – perhaps a third of our total cost of production.

This is our task… our unwelcome task – if we are to help save health care from the cliff. To reduce costs, by reducing waste, at scale, everywhere, now. I recommend five principles to guide that investment:

  1. Put the patient first. Every single deed – every single change – should protect, preserve, and enhance the well-being of the people who need us. That way – and only that way – we will know waste when we see it. 
  2. Among patients, put the poor and disadvantaged first – those in the beginning, the end, and the shadows of life. Let us meet the moral test. 
  3. Start at scale. There is no more time left for timidity. Pilots will not suffice. The time has come, to use Göran Henrik’s scary phase, to do everything. In basketball, they call it “flooding the zone.” It’s time to flood the Triple Aim zone. 
  4. Return the money. This is the hardest principle of them all. Success will not be in our hands unless and until the parties burdened by health care costs feel that burden to be lighter. It is crucial that the employers and wage-earners and unions and states and taxpayers – those who actually pay the health care bill – see that bill fall. 
  5. Act locally. The moment has arrived for every state, community, organization, and profession to act. We need mobilization – nothing less.

On my last night in Washington, I visited the Lincoln Memorial again – standing at the same spot that I had stood at as a twelve-year-old boy 53 years ago. The majesty was still there – the visage of Lincoln, the reach of the Washington Monument, the glow of the Capitol Dome. It was still unbearably beautiful. Still majestic.

But, there was one change. Chiseled in the very stone where I was standing is now the name of Dr. Martin Luther King and the date – August 28, 1963, when he gave his immortal “I have a dream…” speech.

When I first stood at that spot, the Montgomery Bus Boycott was only three years in the past, and Dr. King’s speech lay five years in the future. Rachel Carson’s book, “Silent Spring,” was four years in the future. And it would be six years before the phrase, “Women’s Liberation,” would first be used in America.

I thought, standing there, of something I once heard Dr. Joseph Juran say: “The pace of change is majestic.” And I mused about that majesty, and its nature. It occurred to me that the true majesty lay not just in the words – not just in the call – but also in the long and innumerable connections between the ideas that stir us – the dreams – and the millions and millions of tiny, local actions that are the change, at last. A dream of civil rights becomes real only when one black child and one white child take one cooling drink from the same water fountain or use the same bathroom or dine together before the movie they enjoy together. An environmental movement becomes real only when one family places one recycle bin under one sink or turns off one unneeded light out of respect for an unborn generation. Women’s rights are not real until one woman’s pay check stub reads the same as one man’s, and until my daughter really can be anything she wants to be. The majesty is in the words, but the angel is in the details.

And that is where you come in. Here is the lesson I bring you from 16 months in Washington, DC. Your time has come. You are on the cusp of history – you, not Washington, are the bridge between the dream and the reality – or else there will be no bridge. Our quest – for health care that is just, safe, infinitely humane, and that takes only its fair share of our wealth – our quest may not be as magnificent as the quest for human rights or for a sustainable earth, but it is immensely worthy. You stand, though you did not choose it, at the crossroads of momentous change – at the threshold of majesty. And – frightened, fortunate, or both – you now have a chance to make what is possible real.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Berwick's Vision Will Continue Under Tavenner

The White House has nominated Marilyn Tavenner to run the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), following the resignation of former CMS Administrator Don Berwick, which is a huge disappointment. She will serve as the agency's interim administrator during the confirmation process. Tavenner has served as CMS' principal deputy administrator since February 2010 and served as CMS' acting administrator between February 2010 and July 2010. During her tenure at CMS, Tavenner has helped oversee Medicare, Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. She also had responsibility for the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) which has been responsible for the health reform waivers issued by the agency.

Prior to working for CMS, Tavenner served as secretary of Virginia's Health and Human Services agency. She also has worked for the Hospital Corporation of America, where she started as a staff nurse and eventually served as president of outpatient services. Then former Governor Timothy Kaine appointed her as Virginia’s Secretary of Health and Human Resources where she oversaw 12 agencies that employed 18,000 people.

Senior HHS Officials highlight some of the immediate benefits of health reform for America's seniors before answering questions from the public:
  • Kathleen Sebelius, HHS Secretary
  • Kathy Grennee, Assistant Secretary for Aging 
  • Marilyn Tavenner, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Many stakeholder groups have praised the nomination of Marilyn Tavenner as Berwick's successor. The AMA released a statement in favor of the appointment saying "she has been fair, knowledgeable and open to dialogue." The AHA said in a statement that Tavenner’s "varied and rich background as a former nurse, health care executive, and government official at the state level gives her a very unique perspective in understanding both the implications of public policy and their implementation."

AHIP gave a simple endorsement saying simply: "Marilyn Tavenner’s proven leadership ability and wealth of experience in both the private and public sectors are invaluable assets to CMS as it seeks to address the many health care challenges facing the nation. We look forward to continuing to work with her to improve the quality, safety, and affordability of health care in America."

However not all groups are in favor of Tavenner. "Scrutiny of Tavenner should be no less intense than of Berwick,” stated Jane M. Orient, M.D., executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). The AAPS released a statement very critical of her appointment. There is also likely to be continuing scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, despite House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's approval, who said, "Obviously, I'm not in the Senate, so I don't have that vote, but I do think she is qualified."

If confirmed as CMS administrator, Tavenner would also oversee the allocation of an estimated $27 billion in health IT incentive payments. Under the HITECH Act, healthcare providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health record systems can qualify for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments.

In remarks to the National Association of Medicaid Directors last month, Tavenner shared her thoughts on how to control health care costs in ways very similar to the ideas Berwick has expressed. "The only way to stabilize costs without cutting benefits or provider fees is to improve care to those with the highest health care costs," she said. She also opposed Republican efforts to turn Medicaid into a block grant that would limit the amount of federal funding states can receive for the program. "That approach would simply dump the problem on states and force them to dump patients, benefits or make provider cuts or all the above," she said. Politico has also unearthed audio of Dr. Berwick's replacement speaking quite highly of the health reform legislation, which will certainly be an issue at confirmation hearings.

Marilyn Tavenner speaking to the Nashville Healthcare Council in reference to replacing Berwick said,“Whether I'm nominated or not, we would not have a different approach."

The full audio of her statements from Politico is below:


Thursday, December 1, 2011

Alarming Rise in Healthcare Data Breaches

We need to be guarding our backside with health data...

A new "Benchmark Study on Patient Privacy and Data Security," conducted by the Ponemon Institute, and sponsored by ID Experts, found that health data breaches are rising rapidly. This is partly contributing to medical identity theft which is costing the healthcare industry billions annually. From 2010 to 2011 the frequency of data breaches in health care organizations increased by 32 percent, with hospitals and health care providers averaging four data breaches per organization, according to the study.

Three leading causes of data breaches in health care were lost or stolen equipment, errors by third parties and employee mistakes. Third-party mistakes, including business associates, account for 46 percent of data breaches reported in the study. However, sloppy mistakes by employees have led to many data breach increases, according to 41 percent of respondents. And unintentional employee negligence was the primary cause of data breaches, due in part to increased use of mobile devices by employees.

Nature or root causes of the data breach incident (more than one choice permitted)
More than 80 percent of health care organizations use mobile devices that collect, store, and transmit some form of personal health information, yet half of all respondents to the study reported that measures were not taken to protect these devices. Securing health information on mobile devices is a new frontier for many organizations.

According to the research, 55 percent of health care organizations say they have little or no confidence they are able to detect all privacy incidents. In fact, 61 percent of organizations are not confident they know where their patient data is physically located. Only 22 percent of organizations say their budgets are sufficient to minimize data breaches. 83 percent of hospitals have clearly written policies and procedures to notify authorities of a data breach, but 57 percent don’t believe their policies are effective.

“Health care data beaches are an epidemic,” said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. “These problems are a direct result of our national economy. Healthcare organizations — especially not-for-profit hospitals and small clinics — have thin margins, are trimming staff and resources and are lacking sufficient security and privacy budgets needed to adequately protect patients. I don’t see this getting better anytime soon.”

“Hospital employees are exposing patient data like the back of a hospital gown,” said Rick Kam, president and co-founder of ID Experts based in Portland, Oregon. “Identity theft and medical identity theft resulting from data breach exposure are commonplace, causing patients financial harm, frustration and embarrassment. Hospitals must vaccinate against data breach risks in order to take better care of patients and their data.”

Friday, November 18, 2011

Videos: 2011 ONC Annual Meeting

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) held its 2011 ONC Annual Meeting this week. Much of the event was webcast and their was some great discussion on Twitter using the hashtag #ONCMeeting. Below is a menu of the videos from the sessions:

Opening Remarks
Play Flash Video

Plenary: The Ice Has Broken!
David Blumenthal, Samuel O. Thier Professor of Medicine and Professor of Health Care Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital/Partners HealthCare System and Harvard Medical School

Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), HHS
Play Flash Video

Acceleration and Tipping Points
Moderator: Josh Seidman, Director, Meaningful Use, ONC
Topics to be discussed include:
Speaker: Troy Trygstad, PharmD, MBA, PhD, Director of the Network Pharmacist Program, Community Care of North Carolina
EHR Adoption
Speaker: Carol L. Steltenkamp, MD, MBA, Chief Medical Information Officer, Associate Professor Pediatrics, University of Kentucky; Director, Kentucky Regional Extension Center
Informed Transitions
Speaker: Holly Miller, MD, MBA, FHIMSS, Chief Medical Officer, MedAllies
Consumer E-Health
Speaker: Ted Eytan, MD, MS, MPH, Director, The Permanente Foundation, Kaiser Permanente
Play Flash Video

Keynote: Achieving Big Changes
Jay Walker, Curator, TEDMED Conference
Play Flash Video

Interactive Session: Privacy and Security - You can do it!
Moderator: Joy Pritts, Chief Privacy Officer, ONC
Speaker: Leon Rodriguez, Director, HHS Office for Civil Rights
Play Flash Video

Keynote Presentation
Rick Gilfillan, MD, Acting Director, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Play Flash Video

Getting it Done
Moderator: Claudia Williams, Director, State Health Information Exchange (HIE) Program, ONC
Speakers from the State HIE, Regional Extension Centers, Workforce, Beacon Communities, and SHARP programs will discuss progress, challenges, and solutions.
HIE Grantee
Speaker: Harris Frankel, MD, Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC); Medical Director, UNMC Clinical Neurosciences Center;Â President, Nebraska Health Information Initiative (NeHII)
REC Grantee
Speaker: Lisa Rawlins, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Extension Center
SHARP Grantee
Speaker: Josh C. Mandel, MD, Research Faculty, Children's Hospital Boston & Harvard Medical School
Workforce Grantees
Speaker: Norma Morganti, Executive Director, Midwest Community College Health Information Technology Consortium, Cuyahoga Community College
Speaker: Julie A. Jacko, PhD, Professor of Public Health, University of Minnesota; Principal Investigator and Director, University Partnership for Health Informatics (UP - HI)
Beacon Grantee
Speaker: Julie Schilz, BSN, MBA, Director, Community Collaboratives and Practice Transformation, Colorado Beacon Consortium
Play Flash Video

Meaningful Use is the Foundation for Better Care
Moderator: Janet Wright, MD, Executive Director, Million Hearts Initiative, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
A series of four presentations focusing on how meaningful use can be used to transform care.
Improving the Quality, Safety, and Efficiency of Patient Care
Speaker: Peter Basch, MD, FACP, Medical Director, Ambulatory EHRÂ and Health IT Policy, MedStar Health
Engaging Patients and Families
Speaker: Christopher H. Tashjian, MD, FAAF, Rural Family Physician, Ellsworth Medical Clinic
Improving Care Coordination
Speaker: Deb Aldridge, MSN, RN-BC, Beacon Program Director, Community Care of Southern Piedmont
Improving Population and Public Health
Speaker: Bruce D. Greenstein, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Play Flash Video

IT Bricks and Mortar to Optimize Patient Centered Medical Homes
This session will showcase concrete examples of how information technology-enabled Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) care models have led to improvements in health outcomes. Panelists will discuss their use of strategies and tools (such as registries, clinical decision support and panel management) to increase IT-enabled PCMH-effectiveness in a variety of healthcare settings, and will discuss how to support better uptake and spread of promising practices. Questions the panelists will address include:
What are the high yield HIT investments to optimize PCMH cost, quality and population health outcomes?
What are the key operational learnings for practices across the country?
What should other stakeholders (i.e., payers, employers, state government, vendors) consider to improve IT-enabled PCMH performance?
Play Flash Video

Closing Remarks
Aneesh Chopra, United States Chief Technology Officer, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President
Play Flash Video

Which of these presentations was your favorite?

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Encryption and Electronic Health Records

Your Health and Your Privacy: Protecting Health Information in a Digital World

The Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing entitled “Your Health and Your Privacy: Protecting Health Information in a Digital World” on Wednesday, November 9, 2011. Deven McGraw, Director of the Health Privacy Project at the Center for Democracy and Technology presented testimony (video below). "We know from the statistics on breaches that have occurred since the notification provisions went into effect in 2009 that the healthcare industry appears to be rarely encrypting data," she said. "The wild, wild west for data is not an environment of trust," she added.

Senator Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the subcommittee's ranking member who is also a physician, questioned whether switching to electronic records was worth the riskes. He raised concerns about hackers finding a way to take sensitive records. "They gotta get into my office to get it when it's on a piece of paper," said Senator Coburn. "Maybe we ought to rethink some of what we're doing," he said.

Senator Franken, D-Minn., chairperson of the subcommittee asked Leon Rodriguez, director of the Office for Civil Rights at HHS, when the enforcement rules would be finalized. She could not give a timetable, so Senator Franken told her "OK, well hurry up." After the hearing Senator Franken said, "The bottom line is that people have a right to privacy and to know that their data is safe and secure, and right now that right is not a reality."

These concerns were also discussed in the PCAST Report "A well-designed combination of encryption, authentication [and] authorization…can yield a health IT infrastructure that is secure and where all principals are auditable," the report stated. Earlier this year a survey of more than 500 auditors by the Ponemon Institute, "What auditors think of crypto technologies," found encryption the top choice over data tokenization or other cryptographic techniques. There is little doubt that encryption is a piece of the security puzzle; however, it is not the total answer.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Health Reform and the Supreme Court

I thought this video encapsulated the issues around the upcoming battle over healthcare reform in the Supreme Court and makes a great companion to my post on the topic.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Supreme Court and Healthcare Reform

"Scarcely any question arises in the United States which does not become, sooner or later, a subject of judicial debate."
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835)

The Supreme Court of the United States of America

It is very likely the Supreme Court will decide to eventually hear cases challenging to the new federal health reform law at its Conference on Thursday, November 10. As Jonathan Cohn has said there is no remaining chance that the Supreme Court will pass on the issue altogether. I have included brief biographies and their likely votes when the Court ultimately hears the case(s) below. One of the best resources around on this subject is the SCOTUS Blog healthcare section. I will be following the progress of these important cases and hope to provide a laypersons perspective, while also focusing on some specific aspects of the law pertaining to technology.

One of the first issues to dispense with is the idea that there may be any recusal of any of the Justices on these cases. This will not happen and all of the Justices will participate. While there is clamoring for both Justice Kagan to recuse herself, and Justice Thomas to recuse himself, I would be willing to bet that neither will. Since the justices themselves are their own final arbiters on this decision, they can do what they want and they will hear the case.

The next big question is the final outcome: It will be 5-4 or 4-5. It is still too close to call, but as we get closer to their deliberations I will make a prediction. For now though, I think it is safe to say that Kennedy will (as usual) be the swing vote. As Ilya Somin said on a "Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate" NEJM Perspective Roundtable:
I think the key swing voters then are Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy, and particularly in the case of Kennedy, it’s very difficult to predict where he’ll come down. I would note that in recent opinions, including most recently in Bond vs. the United States, he has emphasized the importance of structural limits on federal power. And he has emphasized the ways in which those limits promote individual liberty.
I disagree that Roberts is likely to uphold the law, but agree that Kennedy will be the deciding vote. Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito will vote to overturn the individual mandate. Justices Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan will vote to uphold the law. So the real question will be how is Kennedy going to vote...

John Roberts, Jr. was born January 27, 1955 and is the 17th and current Chief Justice of the United States. He has served since 2005, having been nominated by President George W. Bush after the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist. He has been described as having a conservative judicial philosophy in his jurisprudence. He is likely to find the individual mandate of health reform unconstitutional, but it isn't clear if he would throw out the entire law.

Justice Antonin Scalia was born March 11, 1936. As the longest-serving justice on the Court, Scalia is the Senior Associate Justice. Appointed to the Court by President Ronald Reagan and has served since Sept. 26, 1986. Scalia has been described as the intellectual anchor of the Court's conservative wing. He is almost certain to find the individual mandate unconstitutional and would likely also overturn the entire law.

Justice Clarence Thomas was born June 23, 1948. He was appointed by President George H.W. Bush and has served since Oct. 23, 1991. Succeeding Thurgood Marshall, Thomas is the second African American to serve on the Court. Thomas is a staunch conservative and has rarely asked any questions during arguments before the court. There is very little doubt that Thomas would find the health reform legislation unconstitutional.

Justice Samuel Alito, Jr. was born on April 1, 1950. He was nominated by President George W. Bush and has served on the court since January 31, 2006. Alito votes with the conservative side of the court. Alito's position will probably be very close to Chief Justice Roberts. I do not think he will find the individual mandate constitutional.

Justice Anthony Kennedy was born July 23, 1936. He was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1988. Since the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor, Kennedy has often been the swing vote on many of the Court's politically charged 5–4 decisions. Conservatives have felt betrayed by some of his decisions, but other observers say he reaches conservative results more often than not. Kennedy would be the swing vote on health reform.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was born March 15, 1933. Ginsburg was appointed by President Bill Clinton and took the oath of office on August 10, 1993. She is the second female justice (after Sandra Day O'Connor) and the first Jewish female justice. She is viewed as belonging to the liberal wing of the Court. She will very likely support the legislation.

Justice Stephen Breyer was born August 15, 1938. He was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994, and known for his pragmatic approach to constitutional law, Breyer is associated with the more liberal side of the Court. Breyer would likely support the individual mandate and certainly will not support overturning the entire law.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was born on June 25, 1954. She was nominated by President Barack Obama to replace retired Justice David Souter and has served on the court since August 8, 2009. Sotomayor is the Court's 111th justice, its first Hispanic justice, and its third female justice. Sotomayor will vote in favor of health reform.

Justice Elena Kagan was born April 28, 1960. She was nominated by President Barack Obama to replace Justice John Paul Stevens and has been serving since August 7, 2010. Kagan is the Court's 112th justice and fourth female justice. Kagan will support the health reform legislation.

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Putting the 'IT' in Care Transitions

Healthcare transitions which are not well coordinated can lead to emergencies, higher costs and lower quality. This is a big problem. Breaking the cycle of hospitalization, nursing home admissions, home health visits, followed by repeated hospitalizations, then spiraling into decline with eventual death is something we must do. In the case of my mother the last years of her life went through this revolving door with very high mental, emotional and financial costs.

A study published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine, confirms what many of us have observed: health care transitions, such as moves in and out of the hospital from a nursing home, do not lead to positive outcomes. More common are frequent medical errors; poor care coordination, infections and additional medications. For patients with acute dementia, these transitions can exacerbate already present symptoms such as agitation, confusion and emotional distress. But improving care transitions is important for everyone.

On Friday, October 14th, 2011, a group of innovators, policy and health IT experts, healthcare providers, patient organizations, technology companies, and government agencies will gather in Washington, D.C. to assess progress in improving transitions in care and to prioritize how better use of health IT can address some of the most difficult challenges related to care transitions on a broader scale. Conference participants will identify:
  • Best practices using health IT that can be implemented immediately to improve care transitions
  • Best practices that can be implemented within a year 
  • A research agenda focused on finding solutions to persistent barriers to further progress.
As a wonderful example of using government as a platform, the John A. Hartford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Kaiser Permanente, with the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT and the Beacon Communities as key participants, are convening this event. Portions of the event will be webcast and there will be active discussion on Twitter and Google Plus. One goal is to encourage debate and interaction among all participants about this important subject through social and traditional media, before, during and after the meeting. Sign up for registration HERE, look for the hashtag #ITrans, and join in the conversation.

The event will focus on a set of prominent drivers of errors that are major opportunities for improvement by better using technology. There will be breakout session during the event on each of these levers. They are:
  1. Discharge process 
  2. Medication reconciliation 
  3. Information flow/exchange 
  4. Patient and care-giver activation
One of the aims of the event will be to coordinate and align multiple ongoing efforts related to transitional care interventions, with a special focus on the role of health IT in improving transitional care interventions. We will also review the most promising transitional care levers and attempt to achieve consensus among experts and practitioners about the most important characteristics or practices currently available. There will be an effort to identify current problems or constraints within each lever and specific actionable steps that can be taken by government, foundations, and the private sector to foster greater innovation/development. Strategies for spreading promising IT-enabled models, and barriers outside the realm of HIT will also be explored.

As HHS CTO Todd Park said, "Care transitions are difficult for patients and families for many reasons. If we can clearly identify the most challenging issues, for which no solutions exist today, we will provide much needed focus to innovators and investors across the country who are energized to improve care for patients, and systems of care for providers."

Some of the speakers participating in the event will be: National Coordinator for Health IT, Dr. Farzad Mostashari; Todd Park, Chief Technology Officer of HHS; Dr. Aaron McKethan, ONC Director of the Beacon Community Program; Dr. Eric Coleman, creator of the Care Transitions Intervention; Dr. Joanne Lynn, Altarum Institute; Carol Beasley, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) and Health Affairs Editor-in-Chief, Susan Dentzer.

Using technology to improve care transitions can have an incredible impact, not only on outcomes but eventually also on the cost of care. Health IT will be key to improving quality by better coordinating care across the healthcare continuum. “By expanding the smart use of health information technology during transitions, we are paving the way for smarter, lower-cost health care and new levels of sustainable health care quality,” said George Bo-Linn, MD, Chief Program Officer of the San Francisco Bay Area Program with the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. “This kind of large-scale, systemic change has the potential to make a difference in people’s lives that will be both lasting and significant.”

“With our eyes on the prize to ensure seamless transitions, we are pursuing a range of aligned strategies including standards, interoperability, exchange and provider adoption and meaningful use. Through our programs, we need to deeply understand and spread the simple yet powerful HIT-enabled solutions that address the complex problem of care transitions,” said Farzad Mostashari.

Care transitions refer to any movement patients make between practitioners and health care settings, but for the purpose of this meeting, are defined as hospital to post-hospital. Hospital readmissions, one common outcome of an unsuccessful transition, are extremely expensive: one in five Medicare patients is back in the hospital within 30 days of discharge, at the cost of approximately $17 billion per year, and many of these readmissions are considered avoidable.

“All health care providers understand both the human need to improve the patient experience during transitions of care, as well as the new demands that Medicare and others will be placing on systems to improve transitions. This meeting is an important service to anyone trying to create patient-centered transitions that are high quality, safe and efficient,” said Scott Young, MD, Associate Executive Director of Clinical Care and Innovation at Kaiser Permanente.

“It is increasingly clear that health information technology, implemented in a patient-centered way, has vast potential to help us reduce the number of injuries, accidents and re-hospitalizations that are causing stress and harm to patients, particularly older patients, every year,” said Christopher Langston, PhD, Program Director of the John A. Hartford Foundation. “We are committed to helping identify and support the best examples of health IT to assist complex patients in their most vulnerable moments.

Friday, October 7, 2011

Ada Lovelace 2.0 - Her Head in the Clouds and Feet on the Ground

Today is Ada Lovelace Day. Last year I wrote an Ada Lovelace post on Jennifer Pahlka, one of the the visionary founders of Code for America. Jennifer actually wrote a post on Carolyn Lawson two years ago for Ada Lovelace Day and this year I want to write about Carolyn. Carolyn recently served as director of the California eServices office and deputy director of the state’s Technology Services and Governance Division and was previously the CIO of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). While at CPUC, she led an effort to bring cloud computing to the agency and brought serious expertise in website re-design in various projects for California state government. In July this year she began her job as CIO of the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) and I am super excited about her role here.

I first met Carolyn at the Gov 2.0 events that Tim O'Reilly convened and then started following her on Twitter and watching her great work in California. This year we had some great discussions in Cambridge, Massachusetts at the first Health FOO. Carolyn presented last year at the Gov 2.0 Expo during a panel on "Finding Value in the Cloud" and in the video below she was interviewed by Alex Howard of O'Reilly Media during the conference:

Carolyn pioneered things like crowd sourcing and greater use of cloud services when she was with California and now in Oregon we will benefit from her experience and vision. Carolyn was also a winner of the prestigious in 2009 for her work in with CPUC for developing a secure mobile environment so employees could work from anywhere on any device, and 2010  for her work at the California eServices Office. One of the many innovations they instituted was a widget created for the state's Employment Development Department that combined the department's news, Twitter and YouTube services for the public. Within two months, the widget had received 2 million impressions and now after being placed on over six thousand websites it has received tens of millions of impressions. The office also worked with six other state organizations to develop and launch a website, at, in support of the Office of Economic Development, after that office was created through the consolidation of other departments. Carolyn is able to use innovation and technology to do more with less.

This is exactly the kind of thinking that we need to apply to healthcare. With decreasing budgets and increasing needs we are approaching a crisis point in healthcare and as the landscape continues to shift Carolyn will be able to bring her insights and approach to help solve some of these vexing problems.

One area that Carolyn has been a thought leader in is in cloud computing. Carolyn's motto is "You don't say we can't, you say we can if..." Carolyn told me, "Could computing has now overcome many of the issues around security and now there is great opportunity for both government and business."  John Foley from Information Week interviewed here after her panel discussion back in 2008 at Enterprise 2.0's "Evening in the Cloud." which you can view below. Since then the industry has matured and some of the barriers to moving into the cloud have fallen away. "Regarding cloud computing 'No!' should not be engraved in your thinking. Maybe in some cases it is 'Not today,' but always be willing to look to the future." I couldn't agree more...

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

HIMSS EHR Association Comments NwHIN Power Team Deliberations

The NwHIN Power Team, a subcommittee of the HIT Standards Committee, has been working over the past few months to analyze and score the NwHIN Exchange (SOAP) and Direct (SMTP/SMIME) specifications on such criteria as:
  • Need for specified capability
  • Maturity of the specification
  • Maturity of the underlying technology used in the specification
  • Deployment and operational complexity
  • Industry adoption
  • Available alternatives
The Power Team reviewed and refined these scores through several iterations, and will present their final analysis and recommendations at the September 28, 2011 HIT Standards Committee meeting.Below are the slides from the NwHIN Power Team recommendations:

Based on industry experience and investments in these efforts not only by health IT suppliers but also by provider organizations, the EHR Association has provided comments to the NwHIN Power Team, focused on several key points, including:

  • Vendor readiness to support the NwHIN Patient Discovery, Query for Documents, and Retrieve (IHE XCPD & XCA) standards is more advanced than reflected in the Power Team analysis.
  • We encourage the Power Team to address the gap resulting from the decision to not consider the use case for sharing health Information among HIE communities.
  • Concerns expressed regarding the “complexity” of the Patient Discovery specification do not reflect the reality that this complexity comes not from the specifications, but from policy decisions not to develop shared patient identification principles and related operational deployment issues.
  • The rationale for proposing to develop a RESTful approach as an alternative to the NwHIN needs to be validated.
  • The Power Team discussion about why a specification gets a low or medium rating should be documented for the sake of transparency.

The full comments (available here) containing a detailed discussion have been submitted to the Power Team. I will post more after the Power Team makes their recommendations to the HIT Standards Committee.

The EHR Association is comprised of industry experts in the field of healthcare information technology with a broad scope of expertise such as medical and clinical informaticists, physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and technology experts who not only represent the EHR software industry but also interact and represent the entire healthcare community. The EHR Association offers unmatched experience and expertise, and provides a forum and structure for EHR leaders to work toward standards development, interoperability, the EHR certification process, performance and quality measures, HIT legislation, and other EHR issues.